26-year-old Homel resident Aliaksandr Hrunou has been repeatedly sentenced to death. According to the lawyer, the young man does not believe that he can be pardoned by the President, and therefore he is not sure whether he will apply for clemency.
On April 8, the Supreme Court re-heard the appeal of Aliaksandr Hrunou against the death sentence, issued to him by the Homel Regional Court. The young man was charged under Part 6 paragraph 2 of Article 139 of the Criminal Code – murder committed with extreme cruelty.
Story of the murder of a Homel student
September 20, 2012 Aliaksandr Hrunou killed his acquaintance, student Natallia Yemelyanchykava. He kept contacts with her brother. Both of them took part in skinhead movements and had a criminal record. At trial, Hrounou explained that for some time before the meeting Natalia had insulted him in the company of his acquaintances by using a word which is very humiliating for the people who have been kept in jail, and did not apologize for it. This was the cause of aggression. As a result, Hrounou inflicted 102 stab wounds to the victim.
Hrunou’s criminal past
Aliaksandr Hrunou had a criminal record before the murder for a brutal beating of his mother’s roommate, who died as a result. He was sentenced to 8 years in jail for it. Hrunou’s mother says that the incident took place during the fight between a stepfather and stepson, they had a personal dislike for each other.
Alexander’s life can be hardly called carefree : his father was killed when he was still a child, and the killer hasn’t been found. His mother periodically lived with different men and consumed alcohol with them. Later, the son joined the company. It’s quite interesting that Natallia Yemialyanchykava’s mother took part in such meetings with Hrunova.
The trial of the case lasted for more than 1,5 years and took about 20 hearings. The prosecutor immediately requested the maximum penalty – execution by shooting. The Homel Regional Court supported this demand. A. Hrunou ahd his lawyer filed an appeal with the Supreme Court.
At the hearing in the Supreme Court in October, Hrunou’s lawyer Siarhei Krasnou emphasized that the criminal legislation of Belarus provided other penalties besides the capital punishment, including imprisonment for a term of 8 to 25 years or life imprisonment.
The defender alos presented a number of violations, reflected in the case materials, but ignored by the court. In particular, the lawyer spoke about the violation of the presumption of innocence in relation to his client, breach of the principle of equal protection and adversarial proceedings and noted the contradictions associated with psychological and psychiatric examination of Mr. Hrunou.
In addition, the lawyer pointed at another thing, which took place immediately after the verdict, and was ignored by everyone: “Even before the sentece of the Judicial Board of the Homel Regional Court entered into force, Hrunou was kept in in solitary confinement on death row in the remand prison of the Main Police Department of the Homel Regional Executive Committee, where he had to wear clothes with the abbreviation “ИМН” (literally “capital punishment”), which means that he was treated as if his fate had already been predetermined…”.
The Criminal Division of the Supreme Court sent the case back for retrial in Homel. According to the lawyer, there were found some circumstances due to which the sentence could be commuted. Aliaksandr cooperated with the investigation, repented, came to the police with a confession. He didn’t deny his guilt, but asked to replace the death penalty, so he had the opportunity to repent and pay the moral compensation to Yemialyanchykava’s family (the victim’s side demanded 300 millions Belarusian roubles).
However, today the Supreme Court has left in force the death verdict. The decision was taken by Chairman of the Criminal Division Valeryy Kalinkovich, who has repeatedly stated that Belarus is ready to refuse from the death penalty. It’s worth noting that he also supported the death sentence to Pavel Seliun in 2013.
The coordinator of the campaign “Human Rights Defenders against the death penalty in Belarus” Andrei Paluda watched the proceedings in Hrunou’s case.
“During the whole story of the independent Belarus, President pardoned only one death convict. This explains why the convicted persons often don’t believe in this institution. In Hrunou’s case the situation is further complicated by the fact that Lukashenka personally stated to Kaniuk that he didn’t deserve any pardon, though the Supreme Court hadn’t issued any verdict by that time,” says the human rights defender. “However, we received a persmission from Hrunou to appeal to the Human Rights Committee of the UN on his behalf.”
As it became known today, the Human Rights Committee of the UN accepted the appeal on behalf of Aliaksandr Hrunou. In accordance with paragraph 92 of the Rules of Procedure of the Committee, the State must not execute the death sentence until the the consideration of the appeal on the merits by the UN.